ASHIANA SHEFFIELD

Registered charity 1120401 · accounts filings on the Charity Commission register

Ashiana has over thirty years' experience of working with Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic & Refugee (BAMER) adults, children & young people fleeing domestic & sexual abuse, forced marriage, human trafficking, gang violence & 'honour'-based violence. Ashiana offers safe accommodation & floating support to women & children, support & services for trafficked men & women in the UK on an outreach basis.

Objects

THE CHARITY’S OBJECTS (“OBJECTS”) ARE SPECIFICALLY RESTRICTED TO THE FOLLOWING:TO RELIEVE THE DISTRESS AND SUFFERING EXPERIENCED BY WOMEN FROM MINORITY ETHNIC GROUPS AND ANY CHILDREN OF SUCH WOMEN (AND IN PARTICULAR ASIAN WOMEN AND WOMEN WITH CHILDREN) WHO HAVE BEEN MALTREATED BY THEIR PARTNERS, OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS OR MEN OR WOMEN KNOWN TO THEM;TO RELIEVE THE DISTRESS AND SUFFERING EXPERIENCED BY MEN TRAFFICKED INTO THE UK.IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE LOCAL AND NATIONAL AUTHORITIES AND VOLUNTARY ORGANISATIONS, THIS RELIEF SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ANY MANNER WHICH IS NOW OR MAY HEREAFTER BE DEEMED BY LAW TO BE CHARITABLE, WITHIN THE CITY OF SHEFFIELD AND ELSEWHERE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM (HEREINAFTER CALLED “THE AREA OF BENEFIT.

Area of benefit: WITHIN THE CITY OF SHEFFIELD AND ELSEWHERE IN THE UKNITED KINGDOM.

The charity’s charitable objects and area of benefit, quoted from its governing document as held on the Charity Commission register.

Causes: Education/training · The Prevention Or Relief Of Poverty · Accommodation/housing · Economic/community Development/employment · Human Rights/religious Or Racial Harmony/equality Or Diversity · website · Get email alerts

Latest income
£5.2m
Latest spending
£5.0m
Registered
2007
Accounts read
FY2025

Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts

The accounts state that the charity made a surplus of £194,563 for the year ended 31 March 2025, with total income of £5,225,748 and total expenditure of £5,031,185. Per the trustees' report, unrestricted reserves stood at £4,009,532, which is sufficient to cover 12 months of running costs based on current budgets. The trustees consider the financial position satisfactory and well-positioned for future objectives.

Automated summary of the FY2025 accounts; the evidenced findings below carry the verbatim passages.

What the accounts disclose

Highest-paid employee band: Under £60,000 — below the median for charities its size (£70k)
“No employees received emoluments in excess of £60,000.” — page 33
Per its FY2025 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.
Reserves policy: 6 months of expenditure (held: £4.0m)
“It has established a policy whereby the unrestricted funds not committed or invested in tangible fixed assets held by the charity should be at least 6 months of the expenditure.” — page 16
Per its FY2025 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.
Related-party transaction: The document states 'No trustees (or any persons connected with them) received any remuneration'. It also states 'The total employee benefits of the key management personnel... were £NIL'. There are no disclosed related party transactions involving payments to trustees or connected parties.
“No trustees (or any persons connected with them) received any remuneration during the year (2024 - £NIL).” — page 33
Per its FY2025 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.
Governance: The document states the statutory accounts originally filed on 28th December 2025 contained an error and were amended. The filing date of the amended accounts (Jan 2026) is after the year-end (Mar 2025), but the document does not explicitly state the filing was 'late' relative to the statutory deadline, only that it was amended. However, the Chair's Review mentions 'delays to funding' and 'challenges', but these are operational, not governance failures. The only explicit governance issue is the amendment due to error. The prompt asks for 'late filing admitted'. The document says 'contained an error... corrected... resubmitted'. It does not explicitly admit 'late filing' as a governance breach, but rather an error correction. Given the strict rule 'NEVER guess', and no explicit 'late filing' admission, this is excluded. Wait, looking at Rule 8: 'late filing admitted'. The document says 'statutory accounts originally filed... contained an error... amended accounts... resubmitted'. It does not say the original filing was late. It says it was filed on 28 Dec 2025. The year end is 31 Mar 2025. Companies House deadline is usually 9 months. Dec 2025 is within 9 months. So it was not late. It was just amended. So no governance flag.
“We hereby confirm that the statutory accounts originally filed with Companies House for the above accounting period, on 28th December 2025, contained an error. The error has now been corrected, and amended accounts have been prepared and are being resubmitted.” — page 2
Per its FY2025 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.
Pension scheme deficit: £10k
“Ashiana Sheffield has been notified by The Pensions Trust of the estimated employer debt on withdrawal from the Plan based on the financial position of the Plan as at 30 September 2024. As of this date the estimated employer debt for Ashiana Sheffield was £10,408” — page 40
Per its FY2025 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.

Accounts audited by Carston ETL. Discloses 6 of 6 completeness components.

Policies the charity declares

In its annual return the charity told the Commission that it has the policies listed below. This is self-declared: it is not verified by the Commission or by this site, and it is not evidence of how a policy works in practice.

Corporate structure

Funders the charity credits

Named as funders/supporters on the charity’s own website (the charity’s claim, distinct from accounts-verified grants).

Company officers (Companies House)

Current officers of the charity’s own company per the Companies House register, cross-checked against the Charity Commission trustee list by name. A director not on the trustee list is usually a timing or naming difference between the two registers — check both records before drawing conclusions.

Official officers record.

Public profiles (found on the charity’s own website): facebook

Structured financials (annual return, FY ending 31/03/2025)

Total income
£5.2m
Total spending
£5.0m
Reserves (reported)
£4.0m
Employees
70

Reported reserves equal ~9.5 months of spending — above the median for charities its size (median 4.8 months; benchmarks).

Per its annual return, largest income source: Charitable activities (99% of income) — components as reported reconcile to the return’s total income; not from the accounts narrative.

Per its annual return, cost of raising funds: 0.0% of total income — below the median for charities its size (5.2%) (benchmarks).

Trustees · trustee networks

Trustee list from the Charity Commission register (current, not historical).

Operates in: Throughout England

Income and spending

Financial year endIncomeSpending
31/03/2025£5.2m£5.0m
31/03/2024£5.5m£5.1m
31/03/2023£5.6m£4.5m
31/03/2022£4.9m£3.6m
31/03/2021£3.6m£3.2m

Common questions

Is ASHIANA SHEFFIELD financially healthy?

Per its FY2025 accounts: The accounts state that the charity made a surplus of £194,563 for the year ended 31 March 2025, with total income of £5,225,748 and total expenditure of £5,031,185. Per the trustees' report, unrestricted reserves stood at £4,009,532, which is sufficient to cover 12 months of running costs based on current budgets. The trustees consider the financial position satisfactory and well-positioned for future objectives. Its FY2025 accounts were audited by Carston ETL.

What does the highest-paid employee of ASHIANA SHEFFIELD earn?

Per its FY2025 accounts, the highest-paid employee was in the Under £60,000 band.

Government & lottery funding

Grants to this charity published as open data by government and lottery funders (360Giving).

FunderDateAmountPurpose
The National Lottery Community Fund27/01/2016£307kCombatting Human Trafficking and Exploitation
The National Lottery Community Fund16/12/2015£379kCombatting Violence Through Empowerment
The National Lottery Community Fund10/02/2010£363kAshiana Sheffield: Empowerment Through Advocacy

Funders of similar charities

Funders whose accounts show grants to charities similar to this one (and no recorded grant to this charity) — a starting list for fundraisers.

Charities like this

Semantically similar by activities and financial character, from our analysed corpus. Compare with REFUGE.

Side by side with its peers

CharityIncomeTop pay bandStaff >£60kReserves vs policyFundraising costGoing concern
ASHIANA SHEFFIELD£5.2mUnder £60,0000unclear—no doubt
REFUGE FY2025£32.0m——above7.0%no doubt
ASIAN WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTRE FY2025£2.7m—0unclear—no doubt
ASHIANA NETWORK FY2025£2.7m—2unclear—no doubt
KARMA NIRVANA FY2025£538k—0above—no doubt
CHINESE INFORMATION AND ADVICE CENTRE FY2025£141k—0within—no doubt

Each row is that charity’s latest analysed filing; every value is quote-backed on its own page.