THE SACHS FOUNDATION — grant history

Registered charity 1181874 · filings on the Charity Commission register · its own accounts analysis · funder finder · deadlines · watch this funder · check a grantee list

listed grants reconcile with the accounts totalextracted from its FY2026 accounts

FY2024: 3 grants totalling £4.0m are listed but excluded from totals: unverified read (amount is larger than the funder’s total spending for the year — probably a units error; the amount is not printed in the accounts text).

Application guidance — from the funder’s own website

• How to apply: Get in touch by sending a message with your name, email, and details via the contact form on the website.

Summarised from eyeontheground.org on 15/08/2026. Always check the funder’s site before applying.

What this funder supports

Based on the register classifications and operating areas of the grant recipients we could match to the charity register (a subset of all grantees).

What changed: FY2025 → FY2026

Grantees that appear, disappear or move by 50%+ between the two most recent filings that have counted grants (unverified reads are left out, so a filing whose grants are all unverified is skipped). A grantee “dropped” may simply have received a multi-year grant earlier.

Grants made, per its accounts filings

Download this grant history as CSV (open data, provenance and licence noted in the file).

1 listed grant has no usable amount in the accounts (shown as “amount not stated”); it is left out of the grant counts and totals.

About this data

This grant list is extracted by automated reading of the grant-maker’s own accounts PDFs as filed with the Charity Commission, and cross-checked against the accounts’ stated grant totals (listed sum 498506 vs reference 498506 (0.0% diff; ref=stated)). Recipients are linked to register entries only on an exact charity-number or unambiguous exact-name match. If you represent this funder or a recipient and want a correction, email [email protected].

Grants marked “Unverified read” were flagged by automated checks as possibly misread from the filed accounts. They stay in the list and the CSV (read_status column) but are left out of the totals, counts and recipient tallies this site computes.