THE PETER SMITH CHARITABLE TRUST FOR NATURE
SUPPORT OF WILDLIFE
Objects
FOR THE BENEFIT OF SUCH CHARITABLE INSTITUTIONS AND CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONS OR CHARITABLE PURPOSES WITHIN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND IN SUCH MANNER AND IM SUCH PROPORTIONS AS THE TRUSTEES MAY FROM TIME TO TIME IN THEIR DISCRETION DETERMINE.
Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts
The accounts state that the charity maintained unrestricted funds of £172,954 at the end of the year, which the trustees consider sufficient to meet their reserves policy target of three to six months' expenditure. The charity reported a net increase in funds of £16,078 for the year, driven by incoming resources from charitable activities exceeding charitable expenditure and governance costs.
What the accounts disclose
“It is the policy of the trust that unrestricted funds which have not been designated for a specific use should be maintained at a level equivalent to between three and six month's expenditure.” — page 5
Year-over-year changes
- Reserves position vs the charity's own policy moved from "below" (FY2024) to "above" (FY2025).
Policies the charity declares
- Complaints policy and procedures
- Financial reserves policy and procedures
- Internal charity financial controls policy and procedures
- Internal risk management policy and procedures
- Investing charity funds policy and procedures
- Investment
- Risk management
- Trustee conflicts of interest policy and procedures
- Trustee expenses policy and procedures
Trustees
- PETER SMITHchair
- JOHN PETER COWLISHAW
- SANDRA SMITH
Income and spending
| Financial year end | Income | Spending |
|---|---|---|
| 31/12/2025 | £250k | £234k |
| 31/12/2024 | £125k | £307k |
| 31/12/2023 | £125k | £415k |
| 31/12/2022 | £125k | £299k |
| 31/12/2021 | £125k | £312k |
Common questions
Is THE PETER SMITH CHARITABLE TRUST FOR NATURE financially healthy?
Per its FY2025 accounts: The accounts state that the charity maintained unrestricted funds of £172,954 at the end of the year, which the trustees consider sufficient to meet their reserves policy target of three to six months' expenditure. The charity reported a net increase in funds of £16,078 for the year, driven by incoming resources from charitable activities exceeding charitable expenditure and governance costs. Its FY2025 accounts were independently examined.
Funders of similar charities
| Funder | Similar charities funded | Amount to them |
|---|---|---|
| JOHN SWIRE 1989 CHARITABLE TRUST | 2 | £35k |
| THE VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST | 1 | £770k |
| ROYAL SOCIETY OF WILDLIFE TRUSTS | 1 | £762k |
| THE BANISTER CHARITABLE TRUST | 1 | £72k |
| THE ALA GREEN CHARITABLE TRUST | 1 | £71k |
| THE LINDER FOUNDATION | 1 | £9k |
| THE THOMAS WALL TRUST | 1 | £8k |
| THE CATHERINE COOKSON CHARITABLE TRUST | 1 | £5k |
Charities like this
- THE WILDLIFE FOR ALL TRUST
- THE BENTLEY WOOD CHARITABLE TRUST
- PETPLAN CHARITABLE TRUST
- THE MITCHELL CHARITABLE TRUST
- THE ADAM SMITH RESEARCH TRUST
- PEOPLE MATTER TRUST
Side by side with its peers
| Charity | Income | Top pay band | Staff >£60k | Reserves vs policy | Fundraising cost | Going concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE PETER SMITH CHARITABLE TRUST FOR NATURE | £250k | — | 0 | above | — | no doubt |
| THE WILDLIFE FOR ALL TRUST | £47k | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |
| THE BENTLEY WOOD CHARITABLE TRUST | £342k | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |
| PETPLAN CHARITABLE TRUST | £871k | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |
| THE MITCHELL CHARITABLE TRUST | £40k | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |
| THE ADAM SMITH RESEARCH TRUST | £447k | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |