CONSERVE GLOBAL

Registered charity 1195017 · accounts filings on the Charity Commission register

Engagement and support in conservation management to formal protected areas and community-based conservation areas in Africa to protect wildlife, habitats and ecosystem integrity whilst unlocking economic opportunities and value for local rural communities.

Objects

3.1 THE COMPANY'S OBJECTS (OBJECTS) ARE SPECIFICALLY RESTRICTED TO THE FOLLOWING:3.1.1 TO PROMOTE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC, ESPECIALLY LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS, THE CONSERVATION, PROTECTION, SUSTAINABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE WORLD'S (AND IN PARTICULAR AFRICA'S) WILDLIFE, ITS NATURAL HABITATS AND MARINE ENVIRONMENT BY SUCH CHARITABLE MEANS AS THE DIRECTORS SHALL FROM TIME TO TIME IN THEIR DISCRETION THINK FIT.3.2 NOTHING IN THE ARTICLES SHALL AUTHORISE AN APPLICATION OF THE PROPERTY OF THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES WHICH ARE NOT CHARITABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7 OF THE CHARITIES AND TRUSTEE INVESTMENT (SCOTLAND) ACT 2005 AND/OR SECTION 2 OF THE CHARITIES ACT (NORTHERN IRELAND) 2008.

The charity’s charitable objects and area of benefit, quoted from its governing document as held on the Charity Commission register.

Causes: Environment/conservation/heritage · Grant history (this charity is a funder) · website · Get email alerts

Registered contact address: Camden, London, England (from the postcode on the register)

Latest income
£4.2m
Latest spending
£5.0m
Registered
2021
Accounts read
FY2025

Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts

The accounts state that the charity reported a net deficit for the year, resulting in a reduction of unrestricted reserves from $2,915,470 to $2,443,831. Despite this deficit, the trustees confirm the charity has adequate resources to continue as a going concern, supported by multi-year funding commitments and a significant pipeline of funding proposals.

Automated summary of the FY2025 accounts; the evidenced findings below carry the verbatim passages.

What the accounts disclose

Payments to trustees: Matthew Rice received $181,403 and Andrew Parker received $199,824 in consultancy fees.
“During the year ended 31 December 2025, two Trustees received consultancy fees for services provided in accordance with Article 6.2.7 of the Articles of Association. Matthew Rice received $181,403 (2024: $168,866), while Andrew Parker received $199,824 (2024: $175,220).” — page 36
Per its FY2025 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.
Related-party transaction: Trustee Andrew Parker's wife (Megan Parker) provided consultancy services.
“Megan Parker, the wife of one of Conserve Global’s Trustees, provided consultancy communications services to Conserve Global during the year. Megan Parker, trading as African Resource, was paid a quarterly retainer fee for these services. Total payments made during the year amounted to $21,050 (2024: $16,375).” — page 37
“During the year ended 31 December 2025, two Trustees received consultancy fees for services provided in accordance with Article 6.2.7 of the Articles of Association. Matthew Rice received $181,403 (2024: $168,866), while Andrew Parker received $199,824 (2024: $175,220).” — page 36
Per its FY2025 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.
Related-party transaction: Trustees Matthew Rice and Andrew Parker received consultancy fees.
“Megan Parker, the wife of one of Conserve Global’s Trustees, provided consultancy communications services to Conserve Global during the year. Megan Parker, trading as African Resource, was paid a quarterly retainer fee for these services. Total payments made during the year amounted to $21,050 (2024: $16,375).” — page 37
“During the year ended 31 December 2025, two Trustees received consultancy fees for services provided in accordance with Article 6.2.7 of the Articles of Association. Matthew Rice received $181,403 (2024: $168,866), while Andrew Parker received $199,824 (2024: $175,220).” — page 36
Per its FY2025 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.

Accounts audited by Sayer Vincent LLP. Discloses 3 of 6 completeness components.

Policies the charity declares

In its annual return the charity told the Commission that it has the policies listed below. This is self-declared: it is not verified by the Commission or by this site, and it is not evidence of how a policy works in practice.

From the charity’s annual return (Part A, self-declared)

Answers and figures the charity gave in Part A of its annual return to the Charity Commission. They are self-declared: not verified by the Commission or by this site. Only positive answers and figures are listed; items not listed are simply not shown.

Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 31/12/2025

  • Employees paid over £60,000: 12 (£60,001–£70,000: 3; £70,001–£80,000: 2; £80,001–£90,000: 2; £90,001–£100,000: 1; £100,001–£110,000: 1; £120,001–£130,000: 1; £130,001–£140,000: 1; £150,001–£200,000: 1)
  • Trustee benefits, answered Yes to: any trustee benefit; payments to trustees for services to the charity
  • Has a trading subsidiary
  • Grant-making is its main activity

Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 31/12/2024

  • Employees paid over £60,000: 1 (£80,001–£90,000: 1)
  • Trustee benefits, answered Yes to: any trustee benefit; payments to trustees for services to the charity
  • Has a trading subsidiary
  • Grant-making is its main activity

Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 31/12/2023

  • Employees paid over £60,000: 1 (£70,001–£80,000: 1)
  • Trustee benefits, answered Yes to: any trustee benefit; payments to trustees for services to the charity
  • Has a trading subsidiary
  • Grant-making is its main activity

Source: this charity’s annual returns on the Charity Commission register.

Corporate structure

CONSERVE MANAGEMENT LIMITED — latest Companies House iXBRL filing (balance sheet 2025-12-31)
  • Turnover: £41k
  • Profit/loss before tax: £25
  • Equity: £1
  • Average employees: 4
CONSERVE MANAGEMENT LIMITED — per its own Companies House accounts
  • The company is wholly owned by its parent charity, Conserve Global.

Company officers (Companies House)

Current officers of the charity’s own company per the Companies House register, cross-checked against the Charity Commission trustee list by name. A director not on the trustee list is usually a timing or naming difference between the two registers — check both records before drawing conclusions.

Official officers record.

Public profiles (found on the charity’s own website): facebook · instagram

Structured financials (annual return, FY ending 31/12/2025)

Total income
£4.2m
Total spending
£5.0m
Cost of raising funds
£398k
Reserves (reported)
£1.8m
Employees
66

Reported reserves equal ~4.3 months of spending — below the median for charities its size (median 4.7 months; benchmarks).

Per its annual return, largest income source: Donations and legacies (86% of income) — components as reported reconcile to the return’s total income; not from the accounts narrative.

Per its annual return, cost of raising funds: 9.5% of total income — above the median for charities its size (5.3%) (benchmarks).

Trustees · trustee networks

Trustee list from the Charity Commission register (current, not historical).

Operates in: Angola · Benin · Botswana · Burkina Faso · Burundi · Cameroon · Cape Verde · Central African Republic · Chad · Comoros · Congo · Congo (Democratic Republic)

Income and spending

Financial year endIncomeSpending
31/12/2025£4.2m£5.0m
31/12/2024£3.3m£3.5m
31/12/2023£3.2m£2.7m
31/12/2022£2.8m£1.2m
31/12/2021£1.4m£535k

Common questions

Is CONSERVE GLOBAL financially healthy?

Per its FY2025 accounts: The accounts state that the charity reported a net deficit for the year, resulting in a reduction of unrestricted reserves from $2,915,470 to $2,443,831. Despite this deficit, the trustees confirm the charity has adequate resources to continue as a going concern, supported by multi-year funding commitments and a significant pipeline of funding proposals. Its FY2025 accounts were audited by Sayer Vincent LLP.

Funders of similar charities

Funders whose accounts show grants to charities similar to this one (and no recorded grant to this charity) — a starting list for fundraisers.

Charities like this

Semantically similar by activities and financial character, from our analysed corpus. Compare with CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL UK.

Side by side with its peers

CharityIncomeTop pay bandStaff >£60kReserves vs policyFundraising costGoing concern
CONSERVE GLOBAL£4.2m——unclear—no doubt
CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL UK FY2025£1.3m£200,000 - £250,000—unclear—no doubt
CONSERVATION WITHOUT BORDERS FY2024£29k—0unclear—no doubt
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION FY2025£894k—0above—no doubt
Defend FY2024£515k—0below—no doubt
Working for the Wild FY2025£31k—0unclear—no doubt

Each row is that charity’s latest analysed filing; every value is quote-backed on its own page.