Defend

Registered charity 1170025 · accounts filings on the Charity Commission register · also known as NATIONAL PARK RESCUE

The charity advances environmental protection and animal welfare by preventing poaching and promoting law enforcement in national parks in Africa.

Objects

TO PROMOTE THE CONSERVATION, PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION OF ANIMALS WHICH ARE IN DANGER OF EXTINCTION IN THE WILD, PARTICULARLY, BUT NOT EXCLUSIVELY, ELEPHANTS, RHINOCEROS AND LIONS WITHIN NATIONAL PARKS IN AFRICA.

Area of benefit: AFRICA

The charity’s charitable objects and area of benefit, quoted from its governing document as held on the Charity Commission register.

Causes: General Charitable Purposes · Animals · Environment/conservation/heritage · website · Get email alerts

Latest income
£515k
Latest spending
£722k
Registered
2016
Accounts read
FY2024

Financial health, per its FY2024 accounts

The accounts state that the charity faced substantial financial uncertainty in 2024, resulting in a deficit on unrestricted funds of £106,214 and negative free reserves of £116,735. The trustees noted that institutional funding was deficient and public fundraising stagnated, forcing reliance on bank reserves. However, they confirmed that additional funding was secured post-year-end, providing a reasonable expectation of adequate resources to continue operations.

Automated summary of the FY2024 accounts; the evidenced findings below carry the verbatim passages.

What the accounts disclose

Reserves position: below the charity's own stated reserves policy (held: £-106k; policy: three months expenditure)
“Free reserves as at 31 December 2024 were £(116,735) (2023: £74,338) which is below this target based on expected expenditure”
Per its FY2024 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.
Related-party transaction: Trustee M Hiley invoiced £58,800 for consultancy/advisory services via National Park Security & Management; £96,000 outstanding at year-end.
“During the year, one of the Trustees, M Hiley (trading as National Park Security & Management (NPSM), Zimbabwe), invoiced / was due £58,800 (2023: £52,800) for consultancy and advisory services. At the Balance Sheet date £96,000 (2023: £46,800) was outstanding and included in creditors.” — page 23
“During the year one of the Trustees, Dr N McCann invoiced £60,000 (2023: £55,000) for consultancy and advisory services. At the Balance Sheet date £5,000 (2023: £5,000) was outstanding and included in creditors.” — page 23
Per its FY2024 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.
Related-party transaction: Trustee Dr N McCann invoiced £60,000 for consultancy/advisory services; £5,000 outstanding at year-end.
“During the year, one of the Trustees, M Hiley (trading as National Park Security & Management (NPSM), Zimbabwe), invoiced / was due £58,800 (2023: £52,800) for consultancy and advisory services. At the Balance Sheet date £96,000 (2023: £46,800) was outstanding and included in creditors.” — page 23
“During the year one of the Trustees, Dr N McCann invoiced £60,000 (2023: £55,000) for consultancy and advisory services. At the Balance Sheet date £5,000 (2023: £5,000) was outstanding and included in creditors.” — page 23
Per its FY2024 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.
Related-party transaction: Expenditure reimbursed to two trustees totalled £80,271 for park operational costs.
“During the year, one of the Trustees, M Hiley (trading as National Park Security & Management (NPSM), Zimbabwe), invoiced / was due £58,800 (2023: £52,800) for consultancy and advisory services. At the Balance Sheet date £96,000 (2023: £46,800) was outstanding and included in creditors.” — page 23
“During the year one of the Trustees, Dr N McCann invoiced £60,000 (2023: £55,000) for consultancy and advisory services. At the Balance Sheet date £5,000 (2023: £5,000) was outstanding and included in creditors.” — page 23
Per its FY2024 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.
Trading subsidiary: Defend, LDA
“Defend also took the formal step towards potential expansion by registering the in-country entity, Defend, LDA.” — page 5
Per its FY2024 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.

Accounts independently examined (not a full audit). Discloses 5 of 6 completeness components.

Policies the charity declares

In its annual return the charity told the Commission that it has the policies listed below. This is self-declared: it is not verified by the Commission or by this site, and it is not evidence of how a policy works in practice.

Corporate structure

Company officers (Companies House)

Current officers of the charity’s own company per the Companies House register, cross-checked against the Charity Commission trustee list by name. A director not on the trustee list is usually a timing or naming difference between the two registers — check both records before drawing conclusions.

Official officers record.

Public profiles (found on the charity’s own website): facebook · instagram

Structured financials (annual return, FY ending 31/12/2024)

Total income
£515k
Total spending
£722k
Reserves (reported)
£0
Employees
0

Reported reserves equal ~0.0 months of spending — in the bottom quarter for charities its size (median 5.2 months; benchmarks).

Per its annual return, largest income source: Donations and legacies (100% of income) — components as reported reconcile to the return’s total income; not from the accounts narrative.

Per its annual return, cost of raising funds: 0.0% of total income — below the median for charities its size (4.9%) (benchmarks).

Trustees · trustee networks

Trustee list from the Charity Commission register (current, not historical).

Operates in: Botswana · Congo · Kenya · Malawi · Mozambique · Namibia · Rwanda · Tanzania · Zambia · Zimbabwe

Income and spending

Financial year endIncomeSpending
31/12/2024£515k£722k
31/12/2023£645k£553k
31/12/2022£340k£420k
31/12/2021£423k£291k
31/12/2020£172k£236k

Common questions

Is Defend financially healthy?

Per its FY2024 accounts: The accounts state that the charity faced substantial financial uncertainty in 2024, resulting in a deficit on unrestricted funds of £106,214 and negative free reserves of £116,735. The trustees noted that institutional funding was deficient and public fundraising stagnated, forcing reliance on bank reserves. However, they confirmed that additional funding was secured post-year-end, providing a reasonable expectation of adequate resources to continue operations. Its FY2024 accounts were independently examined.

Who funds Defend?

Funders whose own accounts filings name Defend as a grant recipient include MATTHEW GOOD FOUNDATION.

Known funders

Grants to this charity found in funders’ own accounts filings.

FunderYearAmountPurpose (as stated by the funder)
MATTHEW GOOD FOUNDATIONFY2023£10k
MATTHEW GOOD FOUNDATIONFY2022£10k
MATTHEW GOOD FOUNDATIONFY2024£10k

Funders of similar charities

Funders whose accounts show grants to charities similar to this one (and no recorded grant to this charity) — a starting list for fundraisers.

Charities like this

Semantically similar by activities and financial character, from our analysed corpus. Compare with Sheldrick Wildlife Trust UK.

Side by side with its peers

CharityIncomeTop pay bandStaff >£60kReserves vs policyFundraising costGoing concern
Defend£515k—0below—no doubt
Sheldrick Wildlife Trust UK FY2025£10.4m£80,001 - £90,0001within—no doubt
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND UK FY2025£1.4m——unclear—no doubt
ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY FY2025£332k—0unclear—no doubt
INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE (IFAW) FY2025£17.4m——unclear—no doubt
ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ISLE OF WIGHT BRANCH FY2024£583k—0unclear—no doubt

Each row is that charity’s latest analysed filing; every value is quote-backed on its own page.