EMMAUS HASTINGS AND ROTHER — grant history
Latest income
£491k
Grants listed (FY2025)
0
Listed grants total
—
Accounts grants total
—
extracted from its FY2025 accounts
Application guidance — from the funder’s own website
- How to apply: The pages do not state that the funder accepts unsolicited grant applications; they focus on donations of goods and volunteering. For collections, one must call 01424 755111 option 1 or use an online booking form.
- What they don’t fund: We are unable to accept hardback books or used bedding, and donations of toys are limited to one bag per person.
Grants made, per its accounts filings
| Recipient | Year | Amount | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-op Local Community Fund | FY2021 | £9k | Note 21 lists 'Co-op Community Foundation' with an incoming resource of 8,769 and expenditure of 5,360. However, Note 3 lists 'Grants from companies' as 9,451. Note 21 breaks down restricted funds. The line 'Co-op Community Foundation' shows Incoming 8,769 and Expended 5,360. Wait, looking at Note 21 again: 'Co-op Community Foundation' has Incoming 8,769 and Expended 5,360. This implies a grant *received*? No, Note 21 is 'Funds'. Incoming resources are grants *received*. Expenditure is grants *paid*. The question asks for grants MADE BY this charity. The charity is Emmaus Hastings and Rother. The list in Note 21 under Restricted funds shows 'Incoming resources' and 'Resources expended'. The 'Incoming resources' column lists grants received FROM donors (e.g., Rayne Foundation, SESF, Lloyds, CRASH, Emmaus UK, Co-op, Ford Trust). The 'Resources expended' column lists how those restricted funds were used. The expenditure lines are not named grantees, but rather fund purposes (e.g., 'Accommodation block building fund', 'Trading building improvements fund'). Therefore, there are no named institutional grantees for grants *paid* by Emmaus Hastings and Rother in these accounts. The charity *received* grants from the entities listed in Note 21 Incoming Resources. It did not make grants to other institutions, other than perhaps internal transfers or payments to staff/companions which are not 'grants to institutions'. The Trustees' Report mentions giving material support to local charities/foodbank/hospice but does not name them or give amounts in the financial statements. Note 7 'Grant funding activities' is 1,000. Note 21 shows 'Grant repayments to Emmaus UK' of 1,000. This is a repayment, not a grant. The 'Resources expended' for the restricted funds are applied to the charity's own building improvements, etc. Thus, there are no grants made to other institutions listed by name with amounts.) -> Correction: Re-reading Note 21 carefully. The column 'Incoming resources' represents money coming IN to the restricted funds (i.e., grants received). The column 'Resources expended' represents money going OUT of those funds. The rows are the *names of the funds* (e.g., 'Rayne Foundation', 'SESF'). The expenditure from the 'Rayne Foundation' fund is 9,950. The expenditure from the 'SESF' fund is 8,262. The expenditure from the 'Lloyds Foundation Grant' fund is 1,033. The expenditure from the 'CRASH Grant' fund is 2,529. The expenditure from the 'Emmaus UK Grant' fund is 261. The expenditure from the 'Co-op Community Foundation' fund is 5,360. The expenditure from the 'Ford Trust' fund is 2,820. The expenditure from the 'Postcode Lottery' fund is 1,771. The expenditure from the 'Job Retention Scheme' fund is 4,930. These expenditures are applied to the charity's own activities (building improvements, etc.), not paid to other institutions as grants. The question asks for grants MADE BY this charity to institutions/organisations. The charity received grants from these foundations. It did not make grants to them. The only potential 'grant' paid is the 1,000 'Grant repayments to Emmaus UK' in Note 7, but Note 20 clarifies this is a repayment of a grant received, not a new grant made. The Trustees' Report mentions support to local charities but no amounts/names are in the accounts. Therefore, the list of grants made is empty or null. However, often 'grants made' in these extraction tasks might refer to the expenditure of restricted funds if the user confuses incoming/outgoing. But the rule is strict: |