NEW LIFE CHURCH (SUFFOLK) — grant history
Latest income
£154k
Grants listed (FY2025)
1
Listed grants total
£30k
Accounts grants total
£30k
listed grants reconcile with the accounts totalextracted from its FY2025 accounts
Grants made, per its accounts filings
| Recipient | Year | Amount | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charitable donations | FY2025 | £30k | Not specified in individual line item, but Note 7 lists 'Charitable donations' as a distinct expenditure line item within Charitable Activities. The Trustees' Annual Report confirms 'The Church made charitable donations during the year of £29,500'. Note 5 shows 'Grants receivable' of £5,000, but this is income. Note 7 breaks down the £29,500 under 'Charitable donations'. No specific grantee name is provided in the notes for this amount, only the category 'Charitable donations'. However, the prompt asks for named grantee organisations. Looking closely at Note 7, the line item is 'Charitable donations' with a value of 29,500. It does not name the recipient. Rule 1 says 'Named grantee organisations with amounts where stated'. If not named, can we extract? Rule 4 says 'individually_listed=false if the accounts only give totals without naming grantees'. Here we have a total for 'Charitable donations' but no names. Wait, let's look at the Africa work section in the Trustees' Report. It mentions 'Passion Alive Church', 'Pastor John Ndhiro', 'Hilltop, Busia & Masaka', 'Pastor Sam Sombi'. But these are narrative descriptions of activities/support, not explicit grant payments with amounts in the financial statements. The financial statements only show a lump sum 'Charitable donations' of £29,500. Therefore, there are no *named* grantees with *stated amounts* in the financial notes. The total is stated, but not broken down by name. Thus, individually_listed should be false? Or should I list the total with the generic name? Rule 1: 'Named grantee organisations with amounts where stated.' If not named, I cannot extract a specific grantee. Rule 4: 'individually_listed=false if the accounts only give totals without naming grantees.' This fits. The accounts give a total for 'Charitable donations' but do not name the grantees. So, no individual grants can be extracted. However, the prompt asks to extract the list. If the list is empty, what do I return? Usually, I return the list. If no named grantees, the list is empty. But I must provide `grants_total_stated_gbp`. The total grants made is £29,500. Is this 'grants'? Note 5 distinguishes 'Donations' and 'Grants receivable' (income). Note 7 lists 'Charitable donations' as expenditure. In charity accounting, 'Charitable donations' often refers to grants given to other organizations. The Trustees' report calls them 'charitable donations'. I will assume this is the grants made. Since no names are provided, `individually_listed` is false. The list of grants is empty. But wait, if I return an empty list, is that correct? Yes. But I need to provide the total. Let's re-read carefully. Note 7: 'Charitable donations ... 29,500'. No name. So, no individual grants. `individually_listed`: false. `grants_total_stated_gbp`: 29500. `grants_made`: []? Or should I include the total as a single entry with a null name? Rule 1: 'Named grantee organisations...'. If not named, it's not a named grantee. Rule 4: 'individually_listed=false if the accounts only give totals without naming grantees.' This implies the list of *individual* grants is not applicable/empty, but the total is known. I will provide an empty list for `grants_made` and the total in `grants_total_stated_gbp`. However, some interpretations might want the total as a single line with 'Charitable donations' as the name. But 'Charitable donations' is a category, not a grantee name. I will stick to the strict rule: Named grantees only. None are named. So empty list. But wait, looking at the Africa section, it says 'supporting Financially Building Project...'. This is narrative. Not a financial statement line item with a specific grantee name and amount. So, strictly, no named grants. ) } ] , |