CAVERSHAM PARK VILLAGE ASSOCIATION

Registered charity 272950 · accounts filings on the Charity Commission register

Our area of benefit is Caversham Park Village in Reading and neighbouring parts of Berkshire and South Oxfordshire.We exist to improve the condition of life for all inhabitants by establishing, maintaining and managing a Community Centre and by advancing education and providing facilities for recreation and leisure time activities.

Causes: General Charitable Purposes · Education/training · Arts/culture/heritage/science · Amateur Sport · website · Get email alerts

Latest income
£135k
Latest spending
£123k
Registered
1977
Accounts read
FY2024

Financial health, per its FY2024 accounts

The accounts state that unrestricted funds increased to £426,693, supported by a substantial cash reserve and a turnaround in financial performance. The trustees report that the charity has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future, with no material uncertainties identified regarding its going concern status.

Automated summary of the FY2024 accounts; the evidenced findings below carry the verbatim passages.

What the accounts disclose

Accounts independently examined (not a full audit). Discloses 4 of 6 completeness components.

Trustees · trustee networks

Trustee list from the Charity Commission register (current, not historical).

Operates in: Reading

Income and spending

Financial year endIncomeSpending
31/10/2025£135k£123k
31/10/2024£122k£106k
31/10/2023£109k£121k
31/10/2022£108k£150k
31/10/2021£108k£113k

Common questions

Is CAVERSHAM PARK VILLAGE ASSOCIATION financially healthy?

Per its FY2024 accounts: The accounts state that unrestricted funds increased to £426,693, supported by a substantial cash reserve and a turnaround in financial performance. The trustees report that the charity has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future, with no material uncertainties identified regarding its going concern status. Its FY2024 accounts were independently examined.