GURU NANAK GURDWARA

Registered charity 271627 · accounts filings on the Charity Commission register · also known as Gurbaj Singh, Jugdeep Singh, Santokh singh mahal

The teaching and promotion of the Sikh religion.

Objects

1.1 THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE SIKH RELIGION, ITS CULTURE AND TRADITIONS.1.2 TO ADVANCE HUMAN RIGHTS, RACIAL HARMONY, DIVERSITY AND PROMOTE COMMUNITY COHESION.1.3 THE PREVENTION AND RELIEF OF POVERTY, ILL HEALTH, DISABILITY AND OTHER HARDSHIPS.1.4 THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN GURUMUKHI AND SIKH HISTORY INCLUDING OTHER CORE SUBJECTSAS AND WHEN NECESSARY.1.5 THE ADVANCEMENT OF HEALTH, SOCIAL CARE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.1.6 THE ADVANCEMENT OF AMATEUR SPORTS, ART, HERITAGE AND SCIENCE.1.7 TO PROMOTE HARMONY WITH THE POLICE, FIRE AND MEDICAL SERVICES.1.8 TO MAINTAIN THE LIBRARY WITH BOOKS ON SIKH RELIGION AND HISTORY; ORGANISE THEOLOGICALDISCUSSIONS AND ARRANGE VAISAKHI AND CELEBRATE GURPURBS.1.9 TO GUARD AGAINST INJUSTICES PERPETRATED AGAINST ANY MEMBER OF THE INSTITUTION.1.10 TO ENCOURAGE YOUTH MALE AND FEMALE MEMBERS TO TAKE PART IN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ANDCOMMUNITY MATTERS.

Area of benefit: LUTON

The charity’s charitable objects and area of benefit, quoted from its governing document as held on the Charity Commission register.

Causes: General Charitable Purposes · Education/training · The Prevention Or Relief Of Poverty · Religious Activities · Amateur Sport · website · Get email alerts

Registered contact address: Luton, East of England, England (from the postcode on the register)

Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts

The accounts state that the charity generated a net income gain of £193,383 for the year ended 28 February 2025, resulting in unrestricted reserves of £4,623,490. The trustees are satisfied that these reserves are more than adequate to meet future expenditures and ensure day-to-day operations continue into the foreseeable future. The auditor confirmed that the use of the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate with no material uncertainties identified.

Automated summary of the FY2025 accounts; the evidenced findings below carry the verbatim passages.

What the accounts disclose

Accounts audited by K B M UK Limited. Discloses 5 of 6 completeness components.

Policies the charity declares

In its annual return the charity told the Commission that it has the policies listed below. This is self-declared: it is not verified by the Commission or by this site, and it is not evidence of how a policy works in practice.

• Bullying and harassment policy and procedures
• Complaints handling
• Complaints policy and procedures
• Engaging external speakers at charity events policy and procedures
• Financial reserves policy and procedures
• Internal charity financial controls policy and procedures
• Internal risk management policy and procedures
• Paying staff
• Risk management
• Safeguarding policy and procedures
• Safeguarding vulnerable beneficiaries
• Serious incident reporting policy and procedures
• Trustee conflicts of interest policy and procedures
• Volunteer management

From the charity’s annual return (Part A, self-declared)

Answers and figures the charity gave in Part A of its annual return to the Charity Commission. They are self-declared: not verified by the Commission or by this site. Only positive answers and figures are listed; items not listed are simply not shown.

Source: this charity’s annual returns on the Charity Commission register.

Annual return filing dates (Charity Commission record)

Of its last 5 annual returns with a recorded received date, 3 were received after the due date: year ending 28/02/2025 (received 06/02/2026, 40 days after the 28/12/2025 due date); year ending 28/02/2023 (received 22/11/2024, 330 days after the 28/12/2023 due date); year ending 28/02/2022 (received 22/11/2024, 695 days after the 28/12/2022 due date).

Due and received dates as recorded in the Commission’s annual-return data; the data does not say whether an extension was agreed. Source: this charity’s annual returns on the Charity Commission register.

Funders the charity credits

Named as funders/supporters on the charity’s own website (the charity’s claim, distinct from accounts-verified grants).

• Ealing Music Service — “Ealing Music Service has generously donated” (source page)

Public profiles (found on the charity’s own website): facebook · instagram

Structured financials (annual return, FY ending 28/02/2022)

Per its annual return, largest income source: Donations and legacies (82% of income) — components as reported reconcile to the return’s total income; not from the accounts narrative.

Per its annual return, cost of raising funds: 0.0% of total income — below the median for charities its size (3.2%) (benchmarks).

Trustees · trustee networks

• Avtar Singh
• Daljit Singh Birring
• Gian singh Raju
• Gurbaj Singh
• Harbhajan singh Sandher
• Jugdeep Singh Malhotra
• Santokh Singh Mahal
• Tejpartap Singh Sahota

Trustee list from the Charity Commission register (current, not historical).

Operates in: Luton

Income and spending

Common questions

Charities like this

Semantically similar by activities and financial character, from our analysed corpus. Compare with GURU NANAK SIKH GURDWARA.

• GURU NANAK SIKH GURDWARA income £100k
• GURU NANAK GURDWARA income £854k
• GURU NANAK GURDWARA (SIKH TEMPLE) income £114k
• THE GURU NANAK GURDWARA WARRINGTON income £103k
• GURU NANAK GURDWARA AND SIKH CULTURAL CENTRE income £103k
• GURU NANAK SOCIETY OF LONDON TRUST income £407k

Side by side with its peers

Each row is that charity’s latest analysed filing; every value is quote-backed on its own page.