ALDERSHOT GARRISON WARRANT OFFICERS & SERGEANTS MESS

Registered charity 1208775 · accounts filings on the Charity Commission register · also known as GARRISON SERGEANTS' MESS

It is established for the benefit of those non commissioned Service Personnel, holding the rank of Sergeant (or other Service equivalents) or above, on the strength of those military units, located within Aldershot Garrison, from which the membership of the mess is drawn and qualifying civilians admitted as members of the mess.

Objects

THE CHARITY'S OBJECT (THE OBJECT) IS 'THE PROMOTION OF EFFICIENCY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE CROWN BY THE PROVISION AND SUPPORT OF FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE EFFICIENCY AND WELL-BEING OF SERVICE PERSONNEL'.

The charity’s charitable objects and area of benefit, quoted from its governing document as held on the Charity Commission register.

Get email alerts

Latest income
£173k
Latest spending
£136k
Registered
2024
Accounts read
FY2025

Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts

The accounts state that total funds increased from £145,186.75 to £118,584.91 is incorrect; actually, total funds brought forward were £145,186.75 and carried forward are £118,584.91? No, looking at the table: Total funds brought forward from previous year is £145,186.75. Net movement is -£13,882.85? No, the table shows 'Net Movement in Funds' as -13,882.85? Let's re-read carefully. The table is messy. 'Total funds brought forward from previous year' is 145,186.75. 'Net Movement in Funds' is -13,882.85? No, the line 'Net Movement in Funds' has value -13,882.85? Wait, the table shows 'Net Movement in Funds' row with values 5,987.31, 31,589.56, 0.00, 37,576.87? No, that's 'Net Incoming/Outgoing Resources Before Transfers'. Then 'Transfers' is 0. Then 'Net Incoming resources before holding gains' is -10,975.03? No. Let's look at the bottom. 'Total funds carried forward' is 118,584.91. 'Total funds brought forward' is 145,186.75. The difference is -26,601.84. The 'Net Movement in Funds' line shows -13,882.85? No, the line 'Net Movement in Funds' seems to correspond to the row with -13,882.85? Actually, the row 'Net Movement in Funds' has values 5,987.31, 31,589.56, 0.00, 37,576.87? No, that's 'Net Incoming/Outgoing Resources Before Transfers'. The row 'Net Movement in Funds' is likely the one with -13,882.85? No, the row 'Net Movement in Funds' is not clearly labeled with a single value. However, the 'Total funds carried forward' is 118,584.91 and 'brought forward' is 145,186.75. The charity's total funds decreased by approximately £26,602. The document does not provide a reserves policy or specific unrestricted reserves figure distinct from total funds.

Automated summary of the FY2025 accounts; the evidenced findings below carry the verbatim passages.

What the accounts disclose

Discloses 2 of 6 completeness components.

Policies the charity declares

In its annual return the charity told the Commission that it has the policies listed below. This is self-declared: it is not verified by the Commission or by this site, and it is not evidence of how a policy works in practice.

Trustees · trustee networks

Trustee list from the Charity Commission register (current, not historical).

Operates in: Hampshire

Income and spending

Financial year endIncomeSpending
31/03/2025£173k£136k

Common questions

Is ALDERSHOT GARRISON WARRANT OFFICERS & SERGEANTS MESS financially healthy?

Per its FY2025 accounts: The accounts state that total funds increased from £145,186.75 to £118,584.91 is incorrect; actually, total funds brought forward were £145,186.75 and carried forward are £118,584.91? No, looking at the table: Total funds brought forward from previous year is £145,186.75. Net movement is -£13,882.85? No, the table shows 'Net Movement in Funds' as -13,882.85? Let's re-read carefully. The table is messy. 'Total funds brought forward from previous year' is 145,186.75. 'Net Movement in Funds' is -13,882.85? No, the line 'Net Movement in Funds' has value -13,882.85? Wait, the table shows 'Net Movement in Funds' row with values 5,987.31, 31,589.56, 0.00, 37,576.87? No, that's 'Net Incoming/Outgoing Resources Before Transfers'. Then 'Transfers' is 0. Then 'Net Incoming resources before holding gains' is -10,975.03? No. Let's look at the bottom. 'Total funds carried forward' is 118,584.91. 'Total funds brought forward' is 145,186.75. The difference is -26,601.84. The 'Net Movement in Funds' line shows -13,882.85? No, the line 'Net Movement in Funds' seems to correspond to the row with -13,882.85? Actually, the row 'Net Movement in Funds' has values 5,987.31, 31,589.56, 0.00, 37,576.87? No, that's 'Net Incoming/Outgoing Resources Before Transfers'. The row 'Net Movement in Funds' is likely the one with -13,882.85? No, the row 'Net Movement in Funds' is not clearly labeled with a single value. However, the 'Total funds carried forward' is 118,584.91 and 'brought forward' is 145,186.75. The charity's total funds decreased by approximately £26,602. The document does not provide a reserves policy or specific unrestricted reserves figure distinct from total funds.

Charities like this

Semantically similar by activities and financial character, from our analysed corpus. Compare with RAF HONINGTON SERGEANTS' MESS.

Side by side with its peers

CharityIncomeTop pay bandStaff >£60kReserves vs policyFundraising costGoing concern
ALDERSHOT GARRISON WARRANT OFFICERS & SERGEANTS MESS£173k—0unclear—no doubt
RAF HONINGTON SERGEANTS' MESS FY2025£110k——unclear—no doubt
SERGEANTS MESS ROYAL MARINES POOLE FY2024£193k—0above—no doubt
SERGEANTS' MESS RAF CONINGSBY FY2025£256k—0above—no doubt
SERGEANTS' MESS, RMB CHIVENOR FY2023£161k—0unclear—no doubt
RAF BRIZE NORTON SERGEANTS MESS FY2026£397k—0unclear—no doubt

Each row is that charity’s latest analysed filing; every value is quote-backed on its own page.