ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION FUND
Support organisations that protect biodiverse hotspots, rejuvenate degraded landscapes and promote environmental activism.
Objects
THE OBJECTS OF THE CHARITY ARE TO ADVANCE SUCH CHARITABLE PURPOSES FOR THE PUBLIC BENEFIT AS THE TRUSTEES MAY IN THEIR ABSOLUTE DISCRETION DETERMINE
Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts
The accounts state that unrestricted reserves decreased significantly from £19,709,738 to £2,855,075 due to charitable expenditure of £17.2 million against incoming resources of £345,458. The trustees maintain that the charity has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. The charity operates a defined contribution pension scheme and has no defined benefit pension deficits.
What the accounts disclose
“The charity's policy is to maintain adequate funds for its commitments for charitable projects across the globe.”
“£5,000 (2024: £5,000) was owed to a trustee at the year end. The balance is interest free and repayable on demand.” — page 22
“During the year, £38,744 (2024: £9,773) of expenditure incurred on behalf of the Ecological Restoration Fund was recharged from a trust controlled by one of the trustees.” — page 22
“£5,000 (2024: £5,000) was owed to a trustee at the year end. The balance is interest free and repayable on demand.” — page 22
“During the year, £38,744 (2024: £9,773) of expenditure incurred on behalf of the Ecological Restoration Fund was recharged from a trust controlled by one of the trustees.” — page 22
“£5,000 (2024: £5,000) was owed to a trustee at the year end. The balance is interest free and repayable on demand.” — page 22
“During the year, £38,744 (2024: £9,773) of expenditure incurred on behalf of the Ecological Restoration Fund was recharged from a trust controlled by one of the trustees.” — page 22
Policies the charity declares
- Bullying and harassment policy and procedures
- Complaints handling
- Complaints policy and procedures
- Conflicting interests
- Financial reserves policy and procedures
- Internal charity financial controls policy and procedures
- Internal risk management policy and procedures
- Investing charity funds policy and procedures
- Paying staff
- Risk management
- Serious incident reporting policy and procedures
- Social media policy and procedures
- Trustee conflicts of interest policy and procedures
- Trustee expenses policy and procedures
From the charity’s annual return (Part A, self-declared)
Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 31/12/2025
- Employees paid over £60,000: 1 (£120,001–£130,000: 1)
- Grant-making is its main activity
Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 31/12/2024
- Employees paid over £60,000: 1 (£90,001–£100,000: 1)
- Grant-making is its main activity
Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 31/12/2023
- Grant-making is its main activity
Corporate structure
- Registered company of the charity Companies House 13871372 · Financial health read from its filings
Leadership, per the charity’s website
- Daniel Hotz — Chair & Founder
- Lenke Bálint — Executive Director
- Olivia Couchman — Grants Director
- Francis Shaw — Director of Chair’s Grants
Company officers (Companies House)
- HOTZ, Daniel Jakob Anders on trustee list
- RAUSING, Anna Lisbet Kristina, Dr on trustee list
- RAUSING, Sigrid Maria Elisabet on trustee list
Structured financials (annual return, FY ending 31/12/2024)
Trustees
- Daniel Hotzchair
- Dr Anna Lisbet Kristina Rausing
- SIGRID RAUSING
Income and spending
| Financial year end | Income | Spending |
|---|---|---|
| 31/12/2025 | £345k | £17.2m |
| 31/12/2024 | £32.3m | £15.5m |
| 31/12/2023 | £16.0m | £13.8m |
Common questions
Is ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION FUND financially healthy?
Per its FY2025 accounts: The accounts state that unrestricted reserves decreased significantly from £19,709,738 to £2,855,075 due to charitable expenditure of £17.2 million against incoming resources of £345,458. The trustees maintain that the charity has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. The charity operates a defined contribution pension scheme and has no defined benefit pension deficits. Its FY2025 accounts were audited by Bright Grahame Murray.
Funders of similar charities
| Funder | Similar charities funded | Amount to them |
|---|---|---|
| THE IAN ASKEW CHARITABLE TRUST | 2 | £5k |
| THE LORD FARINGDON CHARITABLE TRUST | 2 | £3k |
| SWIRE 2765 | 1 | £737k |
| ASPEN TRUST | 1 | £105k |
| SUMATRAN ORANGUTAN SOCIETY | 1 | £94k |
| BACON FOUNDATION LTD | 1 | £60k |
| BERNARD LEWIS FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | 1 | £38k |
| THE BRITFORD BRIDGE TRUST | 1 | £35k |
Charities like this
- RESTORE OUR PLANET
- THE ECOLOGY TRUST
- ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY
- CLIMATE RESPONSE LIMITED
- BALMAIN ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION TRUST
- WILD TEAM CONSERVATION
Side by side with its peers
| Charity | Income | Top pay band | Staff >£60k | Reserves vs policy | Fundraising cost | Going concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION FUND | £345k | — | — | unclear | — | no doubt |
| RESTORE OUR PLANET | £162k | — | — | unclear | — | no doubt |
| THE ECOLOGY TRUST | £2.0m | — | 0 | below | — | no doubt |
| ENDANGERED SPECIES PROTECTION AGENCY | £332k | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |
| CLIMATE RESPONSE LIMITED | £545k | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |
| BALMAIN ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION TRUST | £32k | £35,240 | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |