GRACE OF GOD PENTECOSTAL CHURCH UNITED KINGDOM
HOLDING REGULAR SERVICES TO PROMOTE THE CHRISTIAN FAITH IN THE COMMUNITY.
Objects
THE OBJECT OF THE CIO IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC: TO ADVANCE THE CHRISTIAN FAITH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATEMENT OF BELIEFS IN SUCH WAYS AND IN SUCH PARTS AS THE TRUSTEES FROM TIME TO TIME MAY THINK FIT
Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts
The accounts state that the charity held unrestricted reserves of £1,502 at the end of the year, which is below its stated policy target of maintaining three months of unrestricted expenditure. The filing notes that the charity's costs were well managed, with the main expenses being building rent and staff wages, resulting in a net payment deficit for the year.
What the accounts disclose
“It is the policy of the Charity to maintain unrestricted funds, which are the reserves of the charity at about 3 months of unrestricted expenditure.” — page 4
“Trustee Rev Roberto Faria received remuneration under PAYE scheme of £7434 for services rendered to organisation as pastor of the church.” — page 8
“Trustee Rev Roberto Faria received remuneration under PAYE scheme of £7434 for services rendered to organisation as pastor of the church.” — page 8
Policies the charity declares
- Complaints handling
- Conflicting interests
- Paying staff
- Risk management
- Safeguarding policy and procedures
- Safeguarding vulnerable beneficiaries
Trustees
- Rev ROBERTO DOMINGUES DE FARIAchair
- Fabio Gomes Romagnoli
- Luzineide Lima
Income and spending
| Financial year end | Income | Spending |
|---|---|---|
| 30/09/2025 | £33k | £35k |
| 30/09/2024 | £30k | £28k |
| 30/09/2023 | £28k | £28k |
| 30/09/2022 | £28k | £31k |
| 30/09/2021 | £46k | £45k |
Common questions
Is GRACE OF GOD PENTECOSTAL CHURCH UNITED KINGDOM financially healthy?
Per its FY2025 accounts: The accounts state that the charity held unrestricted reserves of £1,502 at the end of the year, which is below its stated policy target of maintaining three months of unrestricted expenditure. The filing notes that the charity's costs were well managed, with the main expenses being building rent and staff wages, resulting in a net payment deficit for the year. Its FY2025 accounts were independently examined.