OAKWOOD DOG RESCUE
Working Locally in the East Riding area to help unwanted and abandoned dogs by taking them in, feeding, providing shelter, healthcare and any other needs. Finding new homes, assessing new homes, adopting out the dogs.Provides a Community Facility for Dog Owners to go to get education and advice on dog ownership.
Objects
1) FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC TO RELIEVE THE SUFFERING OF DOGS IN NEED OF CARE AND ATTENTION IN PARTICULAR BY MAINTAINING A RESCUE CENTRE OR OTHER FACILITIES FOR THE RECEPTION, CARE AND TREATMENT OF THE DOGS AND SEEKING TO SUITABLY RE-HOME THEM, AND TO TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO ENSURE THEY REMAIN IN THEIR NEW HOME BY OFFERING SUPPORT AND GUIDANCE THE NEW OWNERS;2) TO PROMOTE HUMANE BEHAVIOUR TOWARDS DOGS BY PROVIDING APPROPRIATE CARE, PROTECTION, TREATMENT AND SECURITY FOR DOGS WHICH ARE IN NEED OF CARE AND ATTENTION BY REASON OF SICKNESS, MALTREATMENT, POOR CIRCUMSTANCES OR ILL USAGE AND TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC IN MATTERS PERTAINING TO DOG WELFARE IN GENERAL AND THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY AND SUFFERING AMONG DOGS
Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts
The accounts state that unrestricted reserves increased to £110,370, up from £88,078 in the previous year, following a net income of £22,292. The charity reports no financial liabilities other than rental costs once the bounce back loan is cleared, and the trustees confirm adequate resources for going concern. However, the trustees note that rising costs have prevented an increase in savings and necessitated the return of a rental unit.
What the accounts disclose
“During the year, one company, of which Ms G C Williams, Trustee, is a director, paid rent at market value, for part of the building from the charity.” — page 16
Policies the charity declares
- Bullying and harassment policy and procedures
- Complaints handling
- Complaints policy and procedures
- Conflicting interests
- Financial reserves policy and procedures
- Internal charity financial controls policy and procedures
- Internal risk management policy and procedures
- Paying staff
- Safeguarding policy and procedures
- Serious incident reporting policy and procedures
- Social media policy and procedures
- Trustee conflicts of interest policy and procedures
- Trustee expenses policy and procedures
- Volunteer management
From the charity’s annual return (Part A, self-declared)
Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 30/09/2025
- Volunteers: 50
Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 30/09/2024
- Volunteers: 50
Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 30/09/2023
- Volunteers: 50
Trustees
- Gillian Williamschair
- Jayne Watson
- Lisa Hardy
Income and spending
| Financial year end | Income | Spending |
|---|---|---|
| 30/09/2025 | £366k | £343k |
| 30/09/2024 | £342k | £365k |
| 30/09/2023 | £426k | £445k |
| 30/09/2022 | £390k | £401k |
| 30/09/2021 | £408k | £335k |
Common questions
Is OAKWOOD DOG RESCUE financially healthy?
Per its FY2025 accounts: The accounts state that unrestricted reserves increased to £110,370, up from £88,078 in the previous year, following a net income of £22,292. The charity reports no financial liabilities other than rental costs once the bounce back loan is cleared, and the trustees confirm adequate resources for going concern. However, the trustees note that rising costs have prevented an increase in savings and necessitated the return of a rental unit. Its FY2025 accounts were independently examined.
Who funds OAKWOOD DOG RESCUE?
Funders whose own accounts filings name OAKWOOD DOG RESCUE as a grant recipient include MATTHEW GOOD FOUNDATION, THE DANSON FOUNDATION.
Known funders
| Funder | Year | Amount | Purpose (as stated by the funder) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MATTHEW GOOD FOUNDATION | FY2025 | £4k | |
| THE DANSON FOUNDATION | FY2021 | £2k | |
| THE DANSON FOUNDATION | FY2022 | £2k |
Funders of similar charities
| Funder | Similar charities funded | Amount to them |
|---|---|---|
| THE BERYL EVETTS AND ROBERT LUFF ANIMAL WELFARE TRUST LIMITED | 2 | £12k |
| MARJORIE COOTE ANIMAL CHARITY TRUST | 2 | £4k |
| The Brindle Foundation | 1 | £645k |
| THE ANTHONY V MARTIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | 1 | £21k |
| THE GEORGE CADBURY TRUST (GEORGE HENRY T AND LAURENCE J CADBURY SECTIONS) | 1 | £3k |
| MICHAEL AND SHIRLEY HUNT CHARITABLE TRUST | 1 | £500 |
Charities like this
- OAKWOOD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
- WEST YORKSHIRE DOG RESCUE
- RUSHTON DOG RESCUE
- DOGS IN NEED
- SHEFFIELD DOG RESCUE
- DASH DOGS
Side by side with its peers
| Charity | Income | Top pay band | Staff >£60k | Reserves vs policy | Fundraising cost | Going concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAKWOOD DOG RESCUE | £366k | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |
| OAKWOOD ANIMAL SANCTUARY | £45k | — | — | unclear | — | no doubt |
| WEST YORKSHIRE DOG RESCUE | £223k | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |
| RUSHTON DOG RESCUE | £244k | — | 0 | unclear | — | noted |
| DOGS IN NEED | £136k | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |
| SHEFFIELD DOG RESCUE | £326k | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |