GILLINGHAM AND SHAFTESBURY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY

Registered charity 1115942 · accounts filings on the Charity Commission register · also known as GILLINGHAM AND SHAFTSBURY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY

Latest income
£463k
Latest spending
£436k
Registered
2006
Accounts read
FY2024

Financial health, per its FY2024 accounts

The charity reported a net deficit of £78,159 for the year, reducing its total funds to £310,052. The accounts state that no material uncertainties exist regarding the charity's ability to continue as a going concern. Reserves are maintained in deposit accounts to counter fluctuations in irregular income.

What the accounts disclose

Reserves policy: £75,000 pluvius insurance fund (held: £303k)
The sum of £75,000 has been designated as a pluvius insurance fund, reserved to ensure the Society survive should the main event have to be cancelled or curtailed.
Per its FY2024 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.
Trading subsidiary: Turnpike Events Limited
The Society's wholly owned subsidiary, Turnpike Events Limited, operates the commercial and trading facilities on the Turnpike Showground. — page 4
Per its FY2024 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.

Accounts independently examined (not a full audit).

Trustees

Trustee list from the Charity Commission register (current, not historical).

Operates in: Dorset · Hampshire · Somerset · Wiltshire

Income and spending

Financial year endIncomeSpending
30/09/2025£463k£436k
30/09/2024£467k£546k
30/09/2023£464k£523k
30/09/2022£411k£398k
30/09/2021£385k£286k

Common questions

Is GILLINGHAM AND SHAFTESBURY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY financially healthy?

The charity reported a net deficit of £78,159 for the year, reducing its total funds to £310,052. The accounts state that no material uncertainties exist regarding the charity's ability to continue as a going concern. Reserves are maintained in deposit accounts to counter fluctuations in irregular income. Its FY2024 accounts were independently examined.

Charities like this

Semantically similar by activities and financial character, from our analysed corpus. Compare with ELLINGHAM AND RINGWOOD AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY.