SURREY CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND LIMITED
The object of the Branch shall be to promote and encourage for the benefit of the public the improvement, protection and preservation of the countryside of Surrey and its towns and villages and the better development of the rural environment.
Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts
The accounts state that the charity reported a small net deficit of £766 for the year, with total income of £39,503 and expenditure of £36,595. Total net assets decreased slightly from £240,979 to £240,213, while unrestricted reserves stood at £219,019, which the trustees note is well above their policy target of six months' expenditure. The charity is not registered for VAT, has no employees, and relies on volunteers and freelance service providers for operations.
What the accounts disclose
“Our reserves policy is to maintain an unrestricted fund equivalent to at least 6 months expenditure” — page 4
Trustees
- Emily Johnson
- Gillian Baelz Hein
- Jennet Ann Eyre
- Keith Tothill
- RAMSEY NAGATY
- Richard Gidlow
- Robert Charles Crossing
- Timothy Francis Murphy
Income and spending
| Financial year end | Income | Spending |
|---|---|---|
| 31/12/2025 | £40k | £37k |
| 31/12/2024 | £39k | £36k |
| 31/12/2023 | £158k | £25k |
| 31/12/2022 | £33k | £34k |
| 31/12/2021 | £51k | £68k |
Common questions
Is SURREY CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND LIMITED financially healthy?
Per its FY2025 accounts: The accounts state that the charity reported a small net deficit of £766 for the year, with total income of £39,503 and expenditure of £36,595. Total net assets decreased slightly from £240,979 to £240,213, while unrestricted reserves stood at £219,019, which the trustees note is well above their policy target of six months' expenditure. The charity is not registered for VAT, has no employees, and relies on volunteers and freelance service providers for operations. Its FY2025 accounts were independently examined.