PEAK DISTRICT AND SOUTH YORKSHIRE BRANCH OF THE CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND
We campaign to protect and enhance the countryside of the Peak District and South Yorkshire for the benefit of all by:-+Ç promoting its vitality;-+Ç encouraging sustainability;-+Ç influencing change;-+Ç increasing understanding and awareness.
Objects
TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC THE IMPROVEMENT AND PROTECTION OF THE ENGLISH COUNTRYSIDE AND IN PARTICULAR THE AREA WITHIN THE BRANCH BOUNDARIES AND ITS TOWNS AND VILLAGES AND THE BETTER DEVELOPMENT OF THE RURAL ENVIRONMENT.
Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts
The charity reported a net deficit of £40,819 for the year, resulting in a decrease in unrestricted funds from £600,008 to £561,195. Despite this deficit, free reserves of £560,066 significantly exceed the trustees' policy target of one year's planned operational expenditure (£96,247), a position the trustees attribute to legacy income. The trustees confirm the accounts are prepared on a going concern basis, citing adequate funds and plans to address deficits through fundraising and cost control.
What the accounts disclose
“The trustees require that the equivalent of a years planned operational expenditure should be kept in reserve to ensure that the charity could continue to work through a period of unforeseen difficulty.” — page 10
Policies the charity declares
- Bullying and harassment policy and procedures
- Campaigns and political activity policy and procedures
- Complaints handling
- Complaints policy and procedures
- Conflicting interests
- Financial reserves policy and procedures
- Internal charity financial controls policy and procedures
- Internal risk management policy and procedures
- Investing charity funds policy and procedures
- Investment
- Paying staff
- Risk management
- Serious incident reporting policy and procedures
- Social media policy and procedures
- Trustee conflicts of interest policy and procedures
- Trustee expenses policy and procedures
- Volunteer management
From the charity’s annual return (Part A, self-declared)
Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 31/12/2025
- Volunteers: 20
Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 31/12/2024
- Volunteers: 20
- Employees paid over £60,000: 1 (£60,001–£70,000: 1)
Self-declared on the annual return for the financial year ending 31/12/2023
- Volunteers: 20
Property (HM Land Registry)
Structured financials (annual return, FY ending 31/12/2022)
Trustees
- David Bryan Holmes
- Eugene Richard Walker
- Harry William Brook
- Katharine Netherton
- Leslie John Sturch
- Richard Stewart Mills
Income and spending
| Financial year end | Income | Spending |
|---|---|---|
| 31/12/2025 | £107k | £148k |
| 31/12/2024 | £80k | £205k |
| 31/12/2023 | £430k | £221k |
| 31/12/2022 | £512k | £205k |
| 31/12/2021 | £128k | £195k |
Common questions
Is PEAK DISTRICT AND SOUTH YORKSHIRE BRANCH OF THE CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND financially healthy?
Per its FY2025 accounts: The charity reported a net deficit of £40,819 for the year, resulting in a decrease in unrestricted funds from £600,008 to £561,195. Despite this deficit, free reserves of £560,066 significantly exceed the trustees' policy target of one year's planned operational expenditure (£96,247), a position the trustees attribute to legacy income. The trustees confirm the accounts are prepared on a going concern basis, citing adequate funds and plans to address deficits through fundraising and cost control. Its FY2025 accounts were independently examined.
Government & lottery funding
| Funder | Date | Amount | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| The National Lottery Heritage Fund | 18/02/2019 | £39k | "CPRE Archive Project" |
Funders of similar charities
| Funder | Similar charities funded | Amount to them |
|---|---|---|
| THE O'SULLIVAN FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST | 1 | £25k |
| DALGLEISH TRUST | 1 | £15k |
| THE LIZ AND TERRY BRAMALL FOUNDATION | 1 | £10k |
| JOHN SWIRE 1989 CHARITABLE TRUST | 1 | £1k |
Charities like this
- CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND
- THE HEREFORDSHIRE BRANCH OF THE CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND
- THE CHESHIRE BRANCH OF THE CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND
- CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND - DORSET BRANCH
- THE OXFORDSHIRE BRANCH OF THE CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND
- CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND, SUSSEX BRANCH CIO
Side by side with its peers
| Charity | Income | Top pay band | Staff >£60k | Reserves vs policy | Fundraising cost | Going concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEAK DISTRICT AND SOUTH YORKSHIRE BRANCH OF THE CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND | £107k | — | 0 | above | — | no doubt |
| CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND | £4.3m | — | — | above | — | no doubt |
| THE HEREFORDSHIRE BRANCH OF THE CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND | £100k | — | — | above | — | no doubt |
| THE CHESHIRE BRANCH OF THE CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND | £53k | — | — | unclear | — | no doubt |
| CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND - DORSET BRANCH | £64k | — | 0 | above | — | no doubt |
| THE OXFORDSHIRE BRANCH OF THE CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT RURAL ENGLAND | £905k | — | — | unclear | — | no doubt |