FUTURE REGENERATION OF GRANGETOWN (FROG)

Registered charity 1084817 · accounts filings on the Charity Commission register

Future Regeneration of Grangetown activities continue to benefit the inhabitants of the economically and socially disadvantaged area of Grangetown. The activities include the advancement of education, the promotion of good citizenship and the promotion of other activities which will develop the capacity and skills of residents.

Objects

THE CHARITY'S OBJECTS ARE-:TO FURTHER ANY CHARITABLE PURPOSE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE ECONOMICALLY AND SOCIALLY DISADVANTAGE AREA KNOWN AS GRANGETOWN INCLUDING THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION, THE PROMOTION OF GOOD CITIZENSHIP AND THE ELIMINATION OF UNFAIR DISCRIMINATION ON GROUNDS OF RACE OR SEX AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY AND THE PROMOTION OF ANY OTHER CHARITABLE PURPOSE WHICH WILL DEVELOP THE CAPACITY AND SKILLS OF THE INHABITANTS OF GRANGETOWN IN SUCH A WAY THAT THEY ARE BETTER ABLE TO IDENTIFY AND HELP MEET, THEIR NEEDS AND TO PARTICIPATE MORE FULLY IN SOCIETY.

Area of benefit: GRANGETOWN REDCAR + CLEVELAND

The charity’s charitable objects and area of benefit, quoted from its governing document as held on the Charity Commission register.

Causes: General Charitable Purposes · Education/training · Disability · Environment/conservation/heritage · Economic/community Development/employment · Get email alerts

Registered contact address: Redcar and Cleveland, North East, England (from the postcode on the register)

Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts

The accounts state that the charity reported a net expenditure of £34,341 for the year, resulting in a decrease in total net assets from £1,874,925 to £1,840,584. While unrestricted reserves of £1,770,424 remain significantly above the stated policy target of three to six months' expenditure, the charity is substantially dependent on grants and faces rising utility costs. The trustees maintain that the charity has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future.

Automated summary of the FY2025 accounts; the evidenced findings below carry the verbatim passages.

What the accounts disclose

Accounts independently examined (not a full audit). Discloses 4 of 6 completeness components.

Policies the charity declares

In its annual return the charity told the Commission that it has the policies listed below. This is self-declared: it is not verified by the Commission or by this site, and it is not evidence of how a policy works in practice.

• Bullying and harassment policy and procedures
• Campaigns and political activity policy and procedures
• Complaints handling
• Complaints policy and procedures
• Conflicting interests
• Engaging external speakers at charity events policy and procedures
• Financial reserves policy and procedures
• Internal charity financial controls policy and procedures
• Internal risk management policy and procedures
• Investing charity funds policy and procedures
• Paying staff
• Risk management
• Safeguarding policy and procedures
• Safeguarding vulnerable beneficiaries
• Serious incident reporting policy and procedures
• Social media policy and procedures
• Trustee conflicts of interest policy and procedures
• Trustee expenses policy and procedures
• Volunteer management

From the charity’s annual return (Part A, self-declared)

Answers and figures the charity gave in Part A of its annual return to the Charity Commission. They are self-declared: not verified by the Commission or by this site. Only positive answers and figures are listed; items not listed are simply not shown.

Source: this charity’s annual returns on the Charity Commission register.

Annual return filing dates (Charity Commission record)

Of its last 5 annual returns with a recorded received date, 2 were received after the due date: year ending 30/09/2023 (received 20/09/2024, 52 days after the 30/07/2024 due date); year ending 30/09/2021 (received 03/06/2023, 308 days after the 30/07/2022 due date).

Due and received dates as recorded in the Commission’s annual-return data; the data does not say whether an extension was agreed. Source: this charity’s annual returns on the Charity Commission register.

Structured financials (annual return, FY ending 30/09/2024)

Reported reserves equal ~3.1 months of spending — below the median for charities its size (median 7.2 months; benchmarks).

Per its annual return, largest income source: Charitable activities (100% of income) — components as reported reconcile to the return’s total income; not from the accounts narrative.

Per its annual return, cost of raising funds: 0.0% of total income — below the median for charities its size (3.2%) (benchmarks).

Trustees · trustee networks

• ANDREW ALEXANDER PEARSON
• Jason Murgatroyd
• RONALD NAPIER GRANT

Trustee list from the Charity Commission register (current, not historical).

Operates in: Redcar And Cleveland

Income and spending

Common questions

Known funders

Grants to this charity found in funders’ own accounts filings.

Government & lottery funding

Grants to this charity published as open data by government and lottery funders (360Giving).

Funders of similar charities

Funders whose accounts show grants to charities similar to this one (and no recorded grant to this charity) — a starting list for fundraisers.

Charities like this

Semantically similar by activities and financial character, from our analysed corpus. Compare with QUAGGY DEVELOPMENT TRUST.

• QUAGGY DEVELOPMENT TRUST income £2.7m
• REGENERATE.COM income £1.2m
• Carleton Grange Trust income £194k
• OUR FUTURE income £618k
• YOUNG GENERATION income £35k
• GL11 COMMUNITY PROJECT income £1.0m

Side by side with its peers

Each row is that charity’s latest analysed filing; every value is quote-backed on its own page.