Charity Accounts Intelreading the accounts so you don’t have to

1ST LARKFIELD (HOLY TRINITY) SCOUT GROUP

Registered charity 1026133 · accounts filings on the Charity Commission register

Beavers, Cubs, Scout and Explorer group

Causes: Education/training · Religious Activities · Economic/community Development/employment · Recreation · Other Charitable Purposes · Get email alerts

Latest income
£39k
Latest spending
£31k
Registered
1993
Accounts read
FY2025

Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts

The accounts state that the charity's unrestricted reserves of £4,849.94 were below the trustee-stated policy target of six months' running costs (circa £10,000). Despite this shortfall, the independent examiner confirmed that no material matters came to attention suggesting the accounts were not prepared in accordance with accounting records or the Charities Act 2011.

Automated summary of the FY2025 accounts; the evidenced findings below carry the verbatim passages.

What the accounts disclose

Reserves position: below the charity's own stated reserves policy (held: £5k; policy: six months running costs @circa £10,000)
“The Group held reserves of £4849.94 against this at year end. This is below required for operating expenses.”
Per its FY2025 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.

Accounts independently examined (not a full audit). Discloses 4 of 6 completeness components.

Trustees · trustee networks

Trustee list from the Charity Commission register (current, not historical).

Operates in: Kent

Income and spending

Financial year endIncomeSpending
31/03/2025£39k£31k
31/03/2024£26k£28k
31/03/2023£14k£18k
31/03/2022£10k£10k
31/03/2021£23k£17k

Common questions

Is 1ST LARKFIELD (HOLY TRINITY) SCOUT GROUP financially healthy?

Per its FY2025 accounts: The accounts state that the charity's unrestricted reserves of £4,849.94 were below the trustee-stated policy target of six months' running costs (circa £10,000). Despite this shortfall, the independent examiner confirmed that no material matters came to attention suggesting the accounts were not prepared in accordance with accounting records or the Charities Act 2011. Its FY2025 accounts were independently examined.