Charity Accounts Intelreading the accounts so you don’t have to

CECIL ROSEN CHARITABLE TRUST

Registered charity 1010657 · accounts filings on the Charity Commission register

To provide assistance to Jewish charities and Non Jewish charities particularly in the fields of blindness or disability

Causes: General Charitable Purposes · The Advancement Of Health Or Saving Of Lives · Get email alerts

Latest income
£65k
Latest spending
£28k
Registered
1992
Accounts read
FY2025

Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts

The accounts state that unrestricted funds total £1,609,345, representing a net movement in funds of £36,989 for the year. The trustees report that the charity has maintained satisfactory income and reserves, with no material uncertainties regarding its ability to continue as a going concern.

Automated summary of the FY2025 accounts; the evidenced findings below carry the verbatim passages.

What the accounts disclose

Reserves policy: sufficient monies on deposit to meet current and foreseeable donation commitments (held: £1.6m)
“It is the policy of the charity to hold sufficient monies on deposit to meet current and foreseeable donation commitments”
Per its FY2025 accounts as filed with the Charity Commission.

Accounts independently examined (not a full audit). Discloses 4 of 6 completeness components.

Trustees · trustee networks

Trustee list from the Charity Commission register (current, not historical).

Operates in: Throughout England And Wales

Income and spending

Financial year endIncomeSpending
05/04/2025£65k£28k
05/04/2024£64k£37k
05/04/2023£55k£33k
05/04/2022£53k£38k
05/04/2021£69k£82k

Common questions

Is CECIL ROSEN CHARITABLE TRUST financially healthy?

Per its FY2025 accounts: The accounts state that unrestricted funds total £1,609,345, representing a net movement in funds of £36,989 for the year. The trustees report that the charity has maintained satisfactory income and reserves, with no material uncertainties regarding its ability to continue as a going concern. Its FY2025 accounts were independently examined.