HIGHGATE WOOD AND QUEENS PARK KILBURN
The purpose of the charity is the preservation in perpetuity by the City of London Corporation of the open spaces know as Highgate Wood, Highgate and Queens Park Kilburn for the use by the public for exercise and recreation.
Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts
The accounts state that total income increased to £2,850,184, largely due to a larger grant from the City of London Corporation to fund a deficit on running costs. The charity held free reserves of £200,134, but the trustees consider a reserves policy inappropriate because the City Corporation is committed to contributing as necessary to meet deficits from its City’s Estate Funds.
What the accounts disclose
“An amount of £2,600,842 (2023/24: £1,533,369) was received from the City of London Corporation’s City’s Estate as a contribution towards the running costs of the charity.” — page 12
“The City Corporation provides various services to the charity, the costs of which are recharged to the charity. This includes the provision of banking services, charging all transactions to the charity at cost and crediting or charging interest at a commercial rate. The cost of these services is included within expenditure, as set out in note 7.”
“The Fund’s estimated net liability has been determined by independent actuaries in accordance with FRS102 as £2.7m at 31 March 2025 (£49.9m as at 31 March 2024).” — page 26
Structured financials (annual return, FY ending 31/03/2025)
Register events
- Received assets from another charity (11/08/2011)
Trustees
Income and spending
| Financial year end | Income | Spending |
|---|---|---|
| 31/03/2025 | £2.9m | £2.8m |
| 31/03/2024 | £1.8m | £1.8m |
| 31/03/2023 | £1.5m | £1.5m |
| 31/03/2022 | £1.4m | £1.4m |
| 31/03/2021 | £1.5m | £1.5m |
Common questions
Is HIGHGATE WOOD AND QUEENS PARK KILBURN financially healthy?
Per its FY2025 accounts: The accounts state that total income increased to £2,850,184, largely due to a larger grant from the City of London Corporation to fund a deficit on running costs. The charity held free reserves of £200,134, but the trustees consider a reserves policy inappropriate because the City Corporation is committed to contributing as necessary to meet deficits from its City’s Estate Funds. Its FY2025 accounts were audited by Crowe U.K. LLP.
Funders of similar charities
| Funder | Similar charities funded | Amount to them |
|---|---|---|
| KUSUMA TRUST UK | 1 | £370k |
| THE MOHN WESTLAKE FOUNDATION | 1 | £200k |
| THE LONDON MARATHON CHARITABLE TRUST LIMITED | 1 | £128k |
| CHAPMAN CHARITABLE TRUST | 1 | £2k |
Charities like this
- WEST WICKHAM COMMON AND SPRING PARK WOOD
- EPPING FOREST
- BEDFORD PARK
- BURNHAM BEECHES AND STOKE COMMON
- THE ROYAL PARKS [LIMITED]
- HAMPSTEAD HEATH
Side by side with its peers
| Charity | Income | Top pay band | Staff >£60k | Reserves vs policy | Fundraising cost | Going concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIGHGATE WOOD AND QUEENS PARK KILBURN | £2.9m | — | 0 | unclear | — | no doubt |
| WEST WICKHAM COMMON AND SPRING PARK WOOD | £2.0m | — | — | unclear | — | no doubt |
| EPPING FOREST | £12.4m | — | 4 | unclear | — | no doubt |
| BEDFORD PARK | £107k | — | 0 | above | — | no doubt |
| BURNHAM BEECHES AND STOKE COMMON | £2.1m | over £60,000 | 1 | below | — | no doubt |
| THE ROYAL PARKS [LIMITED] | £109.9m | £180,001 - £190,000 | — | within | — | no doubt |