ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ESSEX MID & NORTH BRANCH CIO

Registered charity 1211083 · accounts filings on the Charity Commission register · also known as ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS MID & NORTH ESSEX BRANCH, RSPCA Essex Mid & North Branch, RSPCA North Essex Branch

- Preventing cruelty to animals and promoting their care and protection and welfare.- Rescue, rehabilitation, and rehoming of animals in need.-Providing veterinary welfare assistance to owned animals, for owners on low incomes.- Promoting neutering and microchipping to reduce the number of unwanted animals.- Educating the public about animal welfare and encouraging good practices.

Causes: Animals · website · Get email alerts

Financial health, per its FY2025 accounts

The accounts state that the charity made an overall surplus of £133,050 for the year, driven largely by a £98,000 grant from RSPCA National used for capital refurbishment. Free reserves totalled £708,000, which the trustees note is slightly above their policy target of six months' operating costs (£487,000). While the underlying operating position is described as a small surplus, the charity continues to manage a deficit in its welfare clinics, which it aims to eliminate by becoming self-funding.

Automated summary of the FY2025 accounts; the evidenced findings below carry the verbatim passages.

What the accounts disclose

Accounts audited by Edmund Carr LLP. Discloses 4 of 6 completeness components.

Property (HM Land Registry)

3 registered titles in England and Wales held by the charity’s company or corporate body (0 freehold). All charity-held property. Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright, OGL v3.0.

Structured financials (annual return, FY ending 31/12/2025)

Reported reserves equal ~8.5 months of spending — above the median for charities its size (median 4.8 months; benchmarks).

Per its annual return, largest income source: Charitable activities (40% of income) — components as reported reconcile to the return’s total income; not from the accounts narrative.

Per its annual return, cost of raising funds: 29.7% of total income — in the top quarter for charities its size (median 5.2%) (benchmarks).

Trustees · trustee networks

• Ruth Elizabeth Jubbchair · trustee of 2 other charities
• Fiona Mary Lawes · trustee of 1 other charity
• Meaghan Lim
• Petula Brigitte Swanton · trustee of 1 other charity
• Rachel Louise Skillen · trustee of 1 other charity
• Robert Ellis
• Rosie Jane Drew

Trustee list from the Charity Commission register (current, not historical).

Operates in: Essex

Income and spending

Common questions

Charities like this

Semantically similar by activities and financial character, from our analysed corpus. Compare with ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS SUFFOLK CENTRAL BRANCH.

• ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS SUFFOLK CENTRAL BRANCH income £1.6m
• ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS CAMBRIDGE AND DISTRICT BRANCH income £386k
• ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS NORWICH BRANCH CIO income £2.3m
• ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS LEEDS, WAKEFIELD AND DISTRICT BRANCH income £1.4m
• ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS COVENTRY AND DISTRICT BRANCH CIO income £1.3m
• ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS SHEFFIELD BRANCH income £1.1m

Side by side with its peers

Each row is that charity’s latest analysed filing; every value is quote-backed on its own page.